Ohio State University professor David Woods and Texas A&M University professor Robin Murphy have drafted three laws of responsible robotics that they claim are more realistic and applicable to the future than science fiction writer Isaac Asimov’s laws. Woods says he believes Asimov intended to use the laws as a literary device, and did not expect engineers to design robots to follow the laws to the letter. “We wanted to write three new laws to get people thinking about the human-robot relationship in more realistic, grounded ways,” he says. Woods and Murphy’s three laws place responsibility on the shoulders of human beings rather than robots, and target the human organizations that develop and deploy robots. The researchers sought ways to guarantee high safety standards. Woods and Murphy’s first law decrees that humans may not implement robots without the human-robot work system being in compliance with the highest legal and professional standards of safety and ethics. The second law dictates that robots must respond to people as appropriate for their roles, while the third law requires robots to be imbued with enough situated autonomy to protect themselves as long as such protection enables the smooth transfer of control and does not clash with the other two laws. “You don’t want a robot to drive off a ledge, for instance–unless a human needs the robot to drive off the ledge,” Woods says. “When those situations happen, you need to have smooth transfer of control from the robot to the appropriate human.”
For more information please visit:Â http://www.cpccci.com
Tags: Robotics
This entry was posted on Monday, August 3rd, 2009 at 8:39 pm and is filed under Computer Science and Engineering News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.